balancer just got drained for ~$116M
this wasn't sophisticated. it was a basic access control bug in their vault contract
here’s how it happened, what it reveals - and why it should scare every defi protocol alive:
1/
the exploit hit balancer v2 today across ethereum, arbitrum, polygon, base, optimism, and more
over $116M gone. 6,590 WETH. 6,851 osETH. 4,260 wstETH
all pulled from the core vault at 0xBA1...BF2C8
2/
the bug was in "manageUserBalance" - a function that's supposed to validate who can move funds
instead, it confused msg.sender with a user-supplied op.sender field
attackers used WITHDRAW_INTERNAL operations to drain tokens they never deposited
3/
what makes this worse?
balancer V2 uses a single vault for everything. every pool, every chain.
hit the vault, hit them all.
many forks are at risk as well.
4/
this is balancer's third major hack in five years
2021, 2023, and now 2025: $116M+ and counting
5/
let's zoom out.
balancer isn't some experiment. $750M TVL. audited.
live for years.and yet: a basic access control flaw sat in prod, audits missed it, no proper sender validation, funds mixed in one central vault.
6/
this is balancer's third major hack in five years
2021: millions lost
2023: $238K after being warned
2025: $116M+
this isn't just a Balancer problem. it's a defi illusion problem
"audited" =/= safe. "battle-tested" =/= secure
7/
takeaway:
basic access control bugs are still destroying blue-chip protocols
if you're building: review every permission check twice.
if you're a user: "audited" means someone looked once, not that it's bulletproof
this wasn't advanced. we're just careless
8/
defi can do better. but first, we need to admit: the basics still matter more than the hype.
i’ll post more as the onchain trail evolves
9/
there are a few reports that the attacker didn't just exploit permissions. they manipulated BPT pricing through precision loss in the StableSwap math.
- drain one token to a rounding edge
- exploit rounding errors to deflate BPT price
- buy back BPT cheap, profit
/10
more details here about how price manipulation was done[1]
still waiting for the balancer’s official response. will keep updating the thread as things unfold.
[1]
12,4 mil
80
O conteúdo desta página é fornecido por terceiros. A menos que especificado de outra forma, a OKX não é a autora dos artigos mencionados e não reivindica direitos autorais sobre os materiais apresentados. O conteúdo tem um propósito meramente informativo e não representa as opiniões da OKX. Ele não deve ser interpretado como um endosso ou aconselhamento de investimento de qualquer tipo, nem como uma recomendação para compra ou venda de ativos digitais. Quando a IA generativa é utilizada para criar resumos ou outras informações, o conteúdo gerado pode apresentar imprecisões ou incoerências. Leia o artigo vinculado para mais detalhes e informações. A OKX não se responsabiliza pelo conteúdo hospedado em sites de terceiros. Possuir ativos digitais, como stablecoins e NFTs, envolve um risco elevado e pode apresentar flutuações significativas. Você deve ponderar com cuidado se negociar ou manter ativos digitais é adequado para sua condição financeira.